Tuesday, September 24, 2013

Blurred Lines







BLURRED LINES                                                                                    by Meg Wozniak

“Sometimes, in order to see the light, you have to risk the dark.”
– Dr. Lois Hineman


Things aren't always black and white, right or wrong, good or bad.  This scene challenges the certainty of the precogs predictions. The quirky and eccentric Dr. Iris Hineman has apparently seen the light and turned away from her controversial research in PreCrime technology. Her current workplace’s organic nature is in stark contrast to the slick, high-tech world of the precogs.  Her attire and demeanor are both strikingly casual considering the weightiness of her position.  The split branch in the center frame of the background suggests a fork in the road, indicating a free will to make our own decisions, to create an alternate fate. The entire scene questions the movie's premise of predetermined fate.

Anderton and Hineman are equally important in the frame, though there is an interesting conflict in the image. Anderton appears to be the aggressor, leaning into the center frame. He is the darker, more threatening of the two characters in appearance, but a bright pure light surrounds him. Hineman looks matronly and nurturing (watering can in hand), yet the lighting surrounding her on the left side is foggy and mysterious. The lines are blurred between good and bad, just like the story line suggests.

The tilted shot emphasizes the enormity of the scene’s revelation, the minority report. The characters seem bigger, more powerful because of the angle. The creator of the system (Hinman) exposes the fatal flaw in PreCrime technology which allows for errors in the permanent verdicts. Meanwhile, the audience is made to feel small and vulnerable upon the realization that the lives of the movie citizens may have been manipulated. Nothing is certain. Lines are blurred.